  # Constraint Programming

By | March 1st, 2015 No Comments on Constraint Programming

When you think of constraints, the general feeling behind them is negative.

Hopefully after reading this, you will think differently!

Sherlock Holmes is often quoted as having said: “when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth.” It is this sentiment that most accurately conveys what constraint programming is all about. It is not uncommon that the solution to a problem comes from a slow exploration of all possible answers, till we reach a tighter and tighter bound for what it could be, and finally arrive at a solution.

Look at Sudoku, we’re sure you are familiar with the popular number-based puzzle that adorns at least one corner of every newspaper in existence. If not, we’d love to buy the rock you’ve been living under, it seems like it might weather a nuclear explosion. If you seriously are not familiar with Sudoku, we’d advise you look it up before reading any further.

The general approach to Sudoku is to look for constraints. You’ll tend to look at blank spots that are surrounded by many numbers, or have many numbers in the same row or column. You do this because those are the locations that are the most constrained and they have the fewest possible options for numbers. You keep looking till you find a spot that can contain only one possible number, and you lock it down. With this new number in place, you suddenly have more constraints. You have new constraints for spaces in the same row, column or block. We now scan the puzzle again, looking for new spots that can now hold only one possible number. Harder Sudoku puzzles can take this a notch deeper by making you analyse a combination of constraints on multiple cells that give you a solution.

When you begin to think about it, there are many problems, and puzzles that work exactly the same way. Constraint programming is a concept that is designed to solve exactly such problems.

So what exactly is constraint programming?

To have something to contrast constraint programming with, let’s look at the immensely popular imperative programming. Imperative programming is the kind of programming commonly employed to create software written in C, Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby etc. Most languages you might have encountered are imperative programming languages, or at least primarily support imperative programming. In imperative programming you give the computer a series of instructions which it then performs in an order. You might wonder, what is the alternative to telling the computer what to do? How will it do anything if you don’t give it a series of steps? One alternative is something called declarative programming. In declarative programming, you don’t tell the computer what to do, but what it is that you want from the computer.

It then figures out how to accomplish that. A good example of this is HTML. In HTML you do not tell a computer how to draw a title or a paragraph, you merely tell the computer what you want, and it handles the rest. If this seems a little weak to you, SQL is another example. SQL code does not focus on how to get data out of a database, instead it just describes the data you want, and the computer figures out how to fetch that data. Again, if you aren’t familiar with it, you will have to look it up to understand better.

Constraint programming then is a form of declarative programming in which you simply give the computer a set of variables, provide a set of constraints that apply to those variables and from that it derives a solution. Now this might sound absolutely magical. No algorithms, no messing with functions and classes and all that. Well, you’re right that it’s magical, but it’s not as simple as you might think. In constraint programming, the most difficult thing is simply trying to convert a problem into a set of variables and constraints. Often you need to think quite deeply to derive constraints that might not appear at first glance.

Also, constraint programming does not make a computer magically understand your natural language. It has its own syntax and conventions that differ between different programming languages and constraint programming libraries. You need to work within the constraints – see what we did there – of constraint programming systems. It will all become clearer when we look at a few popular examples of problems that can be easily solved with constraint programming.

Example problems:

We’ve already mentioned Sudoku above as a good example of constraint programming, now let’s look at another – decidedly academic problem called “SEND + MORE = MONEY”. Here is how this puzzle goes. The alphabets in “SEND”, “MORE”, and “MONEY” are representations of numerical digits. So if “S” is 8, “E” is 4, “N” is 1 and “D” is 7, then “SEND“ stands for the number 8417. What you need to do, is to find what each letter stands for, such that the equation “SEND + MORE = MONEY” holds true. Obviously, here a letter cannot stand for a number like 11, since it represents a digit. Another constraint is that, all alphabets stand for different digits. If you were to look at an imperative solution for this, honestly saying, it wouldn’t be hard. There are only eight distinct letters, and 10 possible values, which leads to just a few million combinations. A modern computer can chew through that pretty quickly.  The n-Queens problem described in the “Solving a Constraint Program by Hand” section, is a lot tougher than it looks when you get to a larger number of queens (with a much larger grid). If you simply start placing queens randomly, you will find more often than not that you need to backtrack and try again.

The 4 queens problem illustrated on the left here shows the n-Queens problem in action with a simple version of the problem that can be solved by hand.

However such a solution would not be applicable to the next problem we discuss, and you would need to develop a solution from scratch.

Now let’s see a constraint programming solution develop in this problem. First of all, we have eight variables (S, E, N, D, M, O, R, Y). The first constraint is that each letter stands for a number between 0 and 9; this is often called the domain of the variable. The second constraint is that each letter is different; there is usually a very easy way to declare this in a constraint programming environment. The final constraint is that equation declared above.

Is this all though? Another constraint that might not be apparent is that “S” and “M” can’t be 0, because valid numbers can’t start with a zero. Dig a bit deeper and immediately you will see that “M” is the carry from the sum of “S”, and “M”. The largest value a carry can have in this case is 1. So the maximum value of “M” is 1, which means that the value of “M” is 1 since it can’t be 0. This also eliminates 1 as a solution to any other digit.

Let’s look at what a solution to this problem would look like in a constraint programming language. The language we are using here is called MiniZinc, and it is in fact one of the sample codes that ships with their software. First, we would need to declare the variables. To save space, we’ll just show one example: var 1..9: S;

Here 1..9 specifies the range of values S can take. Next, we define the constraint that all values must be different: constraint alldifferent([S,E,N,D,M,O,R,Y]);

Finally, the biggest constraint we have is of the equation that must be satisfied. We can represent that as:

constraint 1000 * S + 100 * E + 10 * N + D
+ 1000 * M + 100 * O + 10 * R + E
= 10000 * M + 1000 * O + 100 * N + 10 * E + Y;

After this, all we have to do is instruct the program to solve the constraints as specified. This is accomplished with a simple statement: solve satisfy; That solves the problem for us. This was a rather simple problem that you can solve by hand. So let’s look at something a lot tougher. This one is called the n-Queens problem. It requires one to place n queens on an n-by-n chess board such that no queen can attack any other queen.

If this sounds a little confusing, don’t worry, we will look at this problem in detail.

Go to Page: 1 2 Nash David
Nash David is passionate about technology and mobile devices. He closely follows the smartphone, and tablet platform market. He also leads editorial efforts for devworx. You may send him tweets @nashpd or email editor@devworx.in
@